Why KeepRails
KeepRails vs a manual audit
A human reviewing configs by hand catches nuance — but not repeatably and not at fleet scale. KeepRails makes evidence collection deterministic.
Short answer
A manual audit is defensible once. KeepRails is defensible every month, with the boundary written down and the method versioned.
Where a manual audit wins
Where KeepRails wins
Side by side
A careful human audit catches things automation misses — intent, context, the judgement call about whether a tool earns its keep. KeepRails does not try to remove that judgement; it removes the toil around it.
Running the audit by hand means it happens rarely, differs every time, and rests on whoever is doing it remembering the whole surface. KeepRails runs the same deterministic pass in seconds and turns the result into a dated evidence register — so the human spends their judgement on the decisions, not on enumerating configs.
Use both — that is the honest recommendation
The register becomes the input your assessor reviews, instead of the spreadsheet they distrust. Keep the human judgement; stop hand-collecting the inventory.
curl -fsSL https://staging.keeprails.dev/install.sh | sh